Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2020: Global Trends

Jay Owen Beyond GDP

The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2020

  • Sweden tops the GSCI for a 5th consecutive year, followed by Iceland, Denmark, Finland, & Switzerland
  • UK is ranked 15, Germany 22, US 32, China 39
  • North-East Asia (South Korea, Japan, China) keep dominating the Intellectual Capital sub-index, while Scandinavia tops the Social Capital sub-index
  • Conventional credit ratings do not reflect ESG risks/opportunities and need to be adjusted

The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index evaluates country performance based on the fundamentals that shape the country. It is an inclusive measurement, contrary to the GDP (or credit ratings) that are based on economic output and fiscal numbers (in the case of credit ratings). The GSCI is based on 127 quantitative performance indicators derived from reliable sources (World Bank, various UN agencies, the IMF). The date series are evaluated both against the latest available data as well as the development over the past 10 years to reflect the future outlook. The 127 performance indicators are grouped in 5 pillars that shape country performance:

Take-aways from the 2020 Sustainable Competitiveness Index:

  • The 2012 Index is dominated by Scandinavia and other Northern- European nations, including the Baltic states.
  • The only non-European contenders in the top 20 is New Zealand (11), followed by Japan (28), Uruguay (30), and South Korea (35).
  • Of the World’s largest economies, the UK is ranked 15, Germany 22, Japan 28, the US 32, and China 39. The US is scoring particularly low in social issues, and resource intensity – indicating the danger of decline but also cost reduction opportunities. Brazil is ranked 54, Russia 48, and India 127.
  • The highest ranked African country is Ghana (60). South Africa is ranked 157, while Nigeria, Africa’s most populated nation, is ranked 149.

The Sustainable Competitiveness World Map (dark areas indicate higher score):

Read more, or download the report

Global trends

 

The GSCI is based on the latest available data series, but also on data trends to evaluate whether a specific country is going in the wrong or the right direction and to better reflect the future outlook. The accumulated trends for all countries allow us a glimpse into where our World as a whole is heading:

58% of accumulated trends across all countries are positive, while 38% are going the wrong direction. In Resource efficiency, 44% of trends are negative while in natura capital more than half (51%) are going the wrong way – underscoring the need for better resource efficiency, environmental management, and conservation of the natural environment on the global level.

 

[READ MORE]

Sovereign Bond ratings: insufficient integration of basic fundamentals leads to unecessary investor risks


Conventional credit ratings are based on economic and fiscal numbers and valuation of political developments. They do not take into account the fundamentals that lead to economic numbers or social/environmental developments that shape the future. Sovereign bond ratings determine the credit worthiness of a nation and the interest rate they have to pay on their debt. It is therefore a very significant figure.  A comparison between current ratings (average of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch) and GSCI ratings shows substantial differences:

Generally speaking, richer countries sovereign bond ratings would be lower, while poorer countries rating would increase. The case of oil/gas rich nations also shows that investor risks are not reflected in the credit ratings. It is high time that sovereign bond ratings incorporate ESG factors, benefiting both debtors and reducing the investor risks. Read more here

Country reports are now available!

[READ MORE]