lft-arrow

Tuesday July 29th 2014

40 years of foresight, insight and integrity

rght-arrow

Archives

Subscribe

Get news updates
via email:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Business for Democracy and ASBC Lead Effort to Overturn Citizens United v. FEC

The Business for Democracy Campaign, which the American Sustainable Business Council is spearheading in partnership with Free Speech for People is tackling the compelling issue of corporate contributions to political campaigns.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. FEC decision on January 21, 2010 allows corporations to spend unlimited funds to support or oppose candidates for political office, overturning campaign finance laws in place for decades. The Business for Democracy campaign is an initiative of business leaders and their companies who believe this ruling is in direct conflict with American democratic principles and a serious threat to good government. The campaign supports the four members of the Supreme Court and the 80 percent of Americans who disagree with the decision (Washington Post poll, Feb. 17, 2010).

If you'd like your business to join this effort, you can sign the statement of support here or here.

Debate About What the REAL Fiduciary Duty is Enters Mainstream

Debate about what the REAL fiduciary duty is enters mainstream

Posted: 06 Jul 2010 05:01 PM PDT

The debate about fiduciary duty is one which NSFM members and others have been pushing whenever and wherever we can, but generally it’s in specialist circles and publications. This weekend, the ( UK ) Observer carried an unusually challenging op-ed about what should be the real fiduciary duty of asset owners. It was written by its business editor, Ruth Sunderland, and many of the arguments would resonate with NSFMers:

Companies do not run in isolation in a purely economic universe – they operate in an environmental and social context, and it is part of good ownership to be aware of this.

The view of successive governments is that shareholders, not politicians, should be the overseers of boardroom behaviour, but there are too many weak links in the chain. The interests of the end owner – the pensioners on whose behalf all this activity is supposed to take place – are at best seen as a sideshow, at worst totally ignored.

Her article ends with a head-on challenge: The UK has a banking crisis, an energy crisis and a pensions crisis. The custodians of our retirement funds have, by their laissez-faire behaviour, aided and abetted business in its pollution of society by dirty oil and toxic banking. It is time they started to act like real owners, for the sake of pensioners – and for the sake of their children and grandchildren.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jul/04/pension-funds-corporate-governance-investors

Copyrightt © 2014 EthicalMarkets.com | Supporting the emergence of a sustainable, green, ethical and a just economy worldwide